Article on data protection quoting results of IRISS published in the German newspaper “Lübecker Zeitung” can be found here (pdf) “Datenschutz: Wir sind doch nicht blöd” (July 13/14, 2014).
Category Archives: article
IRISS meets ETTIS at the workshop on prioritisation of research-based opportunities in cyber security and Professional Security Capabilities (PSC)
IRISS meets ETTIS at the workshop on prioritisation of research-based opportunities in cyber security and Professional Security Capabilities (PSC), London, 19 June 2014
The ETTIS consortium organised a workshop in London on 19 June 2014 (0900-1630) focusing on the assessment and prioritisation of research based opportunities for strategic long-term planning in security research. The event was held at Imperial College’s South Kensington Campus – Sherfield Building Seminar & Learning Centre. There were 21 participants on the day. The workshop focussed on different aspects in cyber-related topics such as Cyber Civic Resilience (CCR), Cyber Defense Decision Support (CDDS) and also on Professional Security Capabilities (PSC).The WP leader AIT provided an overview of work done so far on CDDS and CCR. During the workshop the ETTIS consortium and invited experts discussed the pre-identified research based-opportunities in two thematic groups. Rowena Rodrigues from Trilateral Research presented the key research findings and results of the IRISS project as part of the cross-fertilization efforts advocated by the ETTIS project officer. There was some evidence of the intended cross-fertilisation during the workshop discussions, particularly during the thematic discussion on surveillance and society, and the interest expressed in the outputs of the IRISS project (participants were directed to the project website) and the final conference.
IRISS project discusses European responses to the Snowden revelations
A European research consortium has prepared a discussion paper on European responses to the revelations that have been emerging from the documents leaked by Edward Snowden, the contractor to the US National Security Agency (NSA).
The discussion paper reviews the institutional responses to the Snowden revelations, the judicial and legal consequences, the societal, economic, media responses as well as the positive impacts of the revelations.
It draws various conclusions related to the failure of oversight, the privacy-security trade-off paradigm, the breakdown of open democracy, resilience in a surveillance society and protecting privacy in a surveillance society.
The discussion paper is available for download on the IRISS consortium’s website. IRISS is the acronym for Increasing Resilience in a Surveillance Society, which comprises 16 partners from nine EU countries. The project, which began in February 2012, analyses the spread of surveillance systems and technologies in public and private sectors from the perspective of their impact on the fabric of a democratic society. The project aims to explore options for increasing social, economic and institutional resilience and strengthening democratic processes and public discourse about appropriate reactions towards threats against open democratic societies. The EU provided the three-year IRISS project with a grant of €2.6 million.
The discussion paper identifies several positive impacts of the Snowden revelations. They have helped immeasurably to raise society’s awareness of the pervasiveness of surveillance. The revelations have placed surveillance high on the political agenda. The issue of accountability is now being discussed. Until the revelations began, it appeared that there was minimal or no accountability of the NSA and the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), the UK counterpart to the NSA, to their elected officials. Some of the companies subject to surveillance intrusions have increased their security to make it more difficult for governments to surveil their networks. The NSA revelations seem to have had a salutary effect on the public’s paying more attention to their privacy. A Harris poll released 13 November 2013 showed that four out of five people have changed the privacy settings of their social media accounts, and most have made changes in the previous six months.
The discussion paper refers to the bane of the privacy-security trade-off paradigm. When politicians such as President Obama say that they welcome a discussion of the trade-offs between security and civil liberties, the public should be on guard. In striking a balance between collective security and individual privacy, the latter almost always loses out. However, the authors note that many experts and academics have discredited the trade-off paradigm. It is possible to have both privacy and security, without reducing one or the other. A better paradigm is to create what could be called a “balanced risk awareness. This requires the socially responsible management of risks, i.e., to identify risks to privacy and security, either separately or together, and, preferably in consultation with stakeholders, to identify ways of overcoming those risks with no or minimal negative impacts on privacy and/or security. The discussion examines these issues and more and can be found at http://irissproject.eu/?page_id=9.
The IRISS consortium is led by the Institute for the Sociology of Law and Criminology (IRKS, Austria). The other partners include Trilateral Research & Consulting (UK), the University of Stirling (UK), the University of Edinburgh (UK), the Eotvos Karoly Policy Institute (Hungary), the Institute of Technology Assessment (Austria), the University of Sheffield (UK), the University of Hamburg (Germany), Vrije University of Brussel (Belgium), Open University (UK), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Spain), Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V (Germany), the Peace Research Institute Oslo (Norway), the Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Italy), Comenius University Bratislava (Slovakia) and the Universität der Bundeswehr München (Germany).
For more information, contact:
Reinhard Kreissl published an article on “Datatraces” in the “New Scientist Germany” on 22 February 2013 (in German).
“Wie Überwachung ‘intelligent’ werden soll – Software für Videokameras”. Article on smart surveillance by Christoph Behrens; Süddeutsche Zeitung; 9 March 2013 (in German)
Comment on IRISS (in German) “EU-Studie: Die Überwacher gehören überwacht” published by Austrian newspaper “der Standard” on 23 January 2013.